
Bonhoeffer’s discussion is sound from a theological perspective. He writes, “Because Christian community is founded solely on Jesus Christ, it is a spiritual and not a psychic reality.” Though most churches, ours included, would agree with this statement, the truth is that more often than not our conversations about our church and its ministries revolve around programs, equipment, and organization. The necessity of keeping up with the raging machine in developing non-profit organization often threatens the essential identity of the people who feed it. Dreams about the way things ought to be often threaten to replace what is naturally a divine reality with an artificial ideal.
Before we pursue Bonhoeffer’s authentic spiritual community, it is appropriate to consider the cost required in finding it. Bonhoeffer creates a structured paradigm for an ordered life of discipleship that is no easy task. More often than not, in our consumer context, we look for the most product for the least amount of commitment. Bonhoeffer’s order for discipleship requires a commitment in which the benefits far surpasses temporal gain. Structured with simplicity, an emphasis on community, solitude, ministry, and sacrament provide a framework for our consumer impulses that categorizes life in a way not typically understood. Adopting this new framework is the first step in growing past our own predispositions. Though this is no easy task, it is a promising one. A more honest sense of self, a growing appreciation for others, and a heart felt integrity for ministry are all healthy indicators of true Christian discipleship. Perhaps in our church, beginning with confession is the first step towards this renewal.
A mistake should not be made in trying to replace Bonhoeffer’s community with our own. It would indeed be unfortunate to create an ideal of a better day than the one we live in. Bonhoeffer’s work serves the church as many great works of Christian devotion do, by preserving a piece of Church history in the memory of its saints. In one sense, however, one must consider what kind of devotion Bonhoeffer would produce in a context like our own. Without the persecution of a fascist’s regime and having access to the countless resources we have today, what does Bonhoeffer’s Life Together look like in our context? Though I suspect the root material would remain similar, if not unchanged, a creativity and freedom of his work may be in order. Perhaps this is the challenge of our community. Creating life together in our own setting, that is unless we soon find ourselves in a setting not so unlike Bonhoeffer’s. May we have ears to hear!

